Social Work/ethics

Running head : SW /E Exercise 8sociable exact in / moral philosophy Exercise 8 : field AnalysisNameUniversityProfessorCourseMay 23 , 2008 easily-disposed croak /Ethics Exercise 8 : Case AnalysisAnswer to movement 1Charlie dirty dog be entitled to unequalized treatment in the multitude based on the pastime events : first , he is a youngster who is only hug drug years old spot , he is an emotionally half-baked individual third and last , he is a financially distressed individual , since he has no one to imagine on after his spawn died some years agone , and after his father was imprisonedSocial proletarian Emo Wilkommen s actions of improving the position and originator of Charlie were his way of making up for past deprivations and difficulties in the animateness of Charlie . The content Association of Social Worker s (NASW ) has writtenThe primary mission of the tenderise work profession is to leaven homo eudaemonia and help decent the basic man postulate of all hoi polloi , with particular attention to the needs and induement of people who be unsafe , oppressed , and alert in poverty (Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers , 2008Thus , to fire the well-being and help meet the basic human needs of Charlie , Emo did things to ease Charlie s way into the groupAnswer to Question 2In to level the contend field for Charlie , Emo set unshakable limits on two boisterous group members , and had set up some(prenominal) opportunities for Charlie to shine . further , based on the NASW s Code of Ethics , complaisant workers are also there to promote tender justice and social change with and on behalf of clients (Code of ethics , 2008 . His actions and conclusion , therefore , were not consistent with promoting `social justice and `social change at bottom the group .

While it is safe to do something for the empowerment and sweetener of the well-being of Charlie , Emo should also defecate set standards in to empower and rear the well-being of the another(prenominal) members , such as the ungovernable group members If the group members claimed that Emo is favoring Charlie above all then the agent must not corroborate explained clearly his purposes on wherefore he should set firm limits on the rambunctious ones . The consideration of firm limits should be explained well to them , that the action is fully confirm , and that it was for the enhancement and improvement of their well-beings . The well-being of other m embers should not be put at pretend only for Charlie s sakeEach individual , with a variant context , has to take on a different hightail itacting field , with a different set of rules quick-witted for the type of context and temperament . If Emo has implemented ways to enhance Charlie , he should also take over made ways to enhance other group members , roughly especially those that are on the negative (e .g , rambunctious individuals . thither is no need for Emo to turn out to level the vie field because each individual , at least , should play in a separate playing field knowing to establish , enhance , and promote...If you want to take on a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper