Conclusion and Recommendation Essay

Moral implies obligingness to established sanctioned codes or accepted notions of adjust and wrong or the basic moral set of a community. Ethical may suggest the involvement of more difficult or subtle questions of rightness, candor or equity. While legal is sanctioned by rectitude or in conformity with the law especially as it is written or administered by the courts. (Merriam-Webster) Relating the results of the gathered data of the study about the bounder have course session in Baguio City and La Trinidad to morality and the legal aspect of which, the researchers were able to make it up with conclusions and recommendations.Regarding the moral aspect of the practice of dog eating, the study revealed that it is accepted to consume dog snapper. The preponderant reasons are that dogs are basically midpoint for food and dogs are used in the cultural and ritual practice. Dogs are made as offerings and were eaten for health reasons. Law enforcers admitted that dog meat consu mption is a right as guaranteed by our constitution. They too believed that consumption of dog meat will continue. However, trading dog meat is prohibited with the advent of the Anti Rabies Act and the Animal wellbeing Act.In legal parlance, as stated above that dog eating is presumed to be legal for the the act of trading dog meat is prohibited. Even the constitution entitles everyone to our basic needs which include food, shelter and clothing. Eating dog meat is and then legal for the fact that it is considered as food. But with special laws being passed which condemned the trading of dogs for consumption purposes made the eating practice seemingly illegal as well. Knowing now that the trading and not the eating practice is illegal, the researchers recommend a deeper investigation on the source of dog meat supplied in the city and the large(p) town.Our law enforcers like the National Bureau of Investigation and the Philippine National Police should coordinate to be able to put to an end the trade of dogs. Cases filed against trading of dog meat in courts were dismissed referable to the free interpretation of the law. The researchers would therefore recommend for our lawmakers to revisit the Anti Rabies Act and the Animal Welfare Act. For our lawmakers to clearly define animal cruelty and other silent parts of the law which are open for individual interpretations.