Crime and Justice law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Crime and legal expert police - Essay ExampleThe influence of judiciary starts from the point of conviction of an offender or a violator to the sentencing as well as their rehabilitation, if required. Let us now discuss about the UK discriminative system, observing the proportionality and authenticity of its sentencing law. It is a known fact that UK does not have a create verb eithery constitution. That gives it the space for its flexibility, which leads to the huge number of amendments every amendment is deeply correlated with the judicial decisions on the substantial oddballs. Hence, as far the UK judicial system is concerned, it does not only hold the responsibility to convict and decide the episode but it is also responsible for its manipulative decision on a case which reflects in the constitution making Take for example, the R v Templecase, the Court of Appeal held that a basis of excuse should unremarkably be expected to set out the facts, different to those in the prosecution papers, on which the defendant is active to admit his guilt. The court commented adversely on placing undue reliance on an unsigned basis of exculpation and drew attention to the importance of the guidance in the case of R v Underwood that recommended on the use of the responsibility for alerting the prosecutor to areas of dispute rests with the defense.1 In addition, as a result of the case R v H and Others, it was decided and regulation was made that if a defendant wishes to be sentenced on a basis which is not agreed, the prosecution index should invite the judge not to accept the defendants version unless he or she gives evidence on oath to be tested in cross-examination. In much(prenominal) circumstances the defence advocate should be prepared to call the defendant and, if the defendant is not will to testify, subject to any explanation that may be given, the judge may draw such inferences as appear appropriate.2 Judicial system of UK Having a vital responsibil ity given to the court, it has to be approachable to a quality decision making simultaneously need to maintain a companionate relation with public. The judicial system needs to provide security to both physical as well as mental fear emerged due to frequent violence. Hence, the judicial body has the duty to segregate the categories of level of crime and criminals, followed by its conviction and decision for the required sentencing. Further, the duty binds the body to design a secure rehabilitating plan for criminals, so that the general public will be safe from reoccurrence of violence from the convicted criminals. To establish the proportionality of the English sentencing law we need to explore its previous sentencing system. Let us take the example of R v Reynolds and others3. In this case, the prosecuting advocates were made aware of the impact of statutory provisions simultaneously avoid wrong judgment. The prosecution advocate may also offer assistance to the court by making s ubmissions, in the light of all these factors, as to the appropriate sentencing range. To secure obedience with the above mentioned responsibilities, the prosecutor is required to prepare a plea and