Purchasing Student Essay Samples for Lexical Choice

Getting In - Use Scholarship Essay Samples to Get Into Top Colleges

<h1>Getting In - Use Scholarship Essay Samples to Get Into Top Colleges</h1><p>Most of the time, we as a whole expertise significant it is to compose an incredible scholastic exposition and get into school. A fabulous scholastic foundation regularly implies a higher GPA. In any case, so as to ensure that you get into a top school, it's extremely significant that you have outstanding composed skills.</p><p></p><p>As an adolescent or youthful grown-up, it's consistently a smart thought to keep your eyes open for high scholarly accomplishment. It may not really imply that they will send you to a lofty college. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you have some inside data about a remarkable understudy, or on the off chance that you are aware of a youngster who has accomplished a lot, you can utilize this to further your potential benefit. One of the manners in which that you can do this is by getting a scholarship.</p><p></p& gt;<p>You can utilize grant exposition tests to get access to an esteemed school or college, by submitting them to the school's money related guide office. A grant article test will assist you with handling that desired grant and allow you to do it the correct way. This is significant in light of the fact that the grant advisory group is searching for quality, elegantly composed grant expositions that are straightforward and convey a positive proclamation about your appointment for the scholarship.</p><p></p><p>What makes grant articles so special is that these examples generally include extraordinary scholastic achievements and extracurricular accomplishments. These are the individuals who decide if you get in. Grant tests are unmistakable about the points that ought to be incorporated. They need to have a universal knowledge of a forthcoming student.</p><p></p><p>For occasion, they need to think about your instructive foundatio n and experience. You ought to likewise enlighten them regarding your own accomplishments. These are the segments that will permit the grant council to perceive your value of an award.</p><p></p><p>You additionally need to show verification of what you did at highschool. You'll be approached to give any honors, grades, grants, partnerships, and such. In the event that you've never gotten any of these things, it's ideal to let them know so they can give you a superior possibility at getting acknowledged. Make certain to enlighten them concerning the various sorts of grants that you've gotten, as well.</p><p></p><p>The board of trustees needs to think about the kinds of courses that you took, just as scholastic administration. Something else that you should let them know is what you're as of now chipping away at. This will assist them with realizing how included you are in your school and community.</p><p></p><p>D on't ignore the significance of composing a phenomenal scholastic paper. Utilizing grant exposition tests will assist you with figuring out how to get into top schools and colleges, while giving you an opportunity to flaunt your scholastic accomplishments. The more you compose, the more you'll escape your scholarly background.</p>

Explaining Supreme Court Decisions - Free Essay Example

As the nations highest court, the Supreme Court makes decisions that affects the lives of everyday people and has major legal implications. The court addresses issues from abortion to free speech. It has the power to strike down laws passed by Congress or actions by the president it interprets to be unconstitutional. In theory, the Supreme Court and its members are independent from the rest of the federal government and above politics since they are appointed to the court rather than elected. Several factors influence the decisions that members of the Supreme Court, these factors are precedent, public opinion, interest groups, and the Justices personal political ideologies. I believe that in terms of Madisonian democracy, the Supreme Court is an important and effective institution, despite the paradox it sometimes has in our democracy. When making decisions, the Supreme Court often takes the legal idea of stare decisis into consideration. Stare decisis refers to the Latin phrase let it stand. This refers to precedent. Precedent in a legal system is meant to help guide judges in future decisions they make should the issue or a case related to that issue come up before the court, or lower courts again. When a decision is handed down, Justices can refer to stare decisis as a reason for their decision. When Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) came before the Supreme Court, Sandra Day OConnor in her majority decision reaffirmed the constitutional right to an abortion set in Roe v. Wade (1973). Roe set the precedent that the right to an abortion was guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Despite the Courts ruling reaffirming the right to an abortion, this precedent has been put aside before. The Supreme Court upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2003 in the case of Gonzales v. Carhart (2007). In that case, then Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion that that banning partial-birth abortion was not an undue burden on women who were seeking an abortion, and that Congress indeed had the power to ban partial-birth abortions. In her dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg claimed that the Court was ignoring precedent by placing a restriction on abortion, and not allowing a woman to make a decision for herself. In other cases, precedent in the Supreme Court has been outright ignored. The Supreme Court overturned previously established precedent made in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) in its decision of Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which regarded the idea of separate but equal expressed in Plessy as unconstitutional. Precedent was once again ignored in the case of Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which overturned the case of Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), which had upheld the constitutionality of anti-sodomy laws in the United States. The Supreme Court has taken the idea of precedent into its legal decisions, and at times, chosen to accept it or ignore it, as seen in these cases mentioned above. When the Supreme Court makes decisions, public opinion is taken into consideration. One may wonder why the Court would bother to do this, as the members of the Court are appointed for life, and the Justices do not have to answer to the American people why they rule in a particular way, unlike decisions made by Congress or the President of the United States. The Court takes public opinion into consideration because the decision would likely reflect the values of the American people. The Warren court is a prime example of this, as it made liberal decisions at a time when the American people were rather liberal in regards to matters such as race, as seen in Loving v. Virginia (1967), or free speech in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). These examples require looking at the context of the time period these decisions were made in. Loving struck down bans on interracial marriage at a time when the Civil Rights movement was well underway by then. Tinker was handed down at a time when protesting t he Vietnam War was almost universal among the American people, who had grown frustrated with the deteriorating situation in Southeast Asia. Further examples could even include the infamous decision of Korematsu v. United States (1944), as a reflection of the mindset of the American public and anti-Japanese sentiment during World War II. Bringing us to the 21st century, the Supreme Court has made decisions that reflected public opinion, in overturning anti-sodomy laws in Lawrence v. Texas (2003), or striking down the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 in United States v. Windsor (2013) and guaranteeing same sex couples the right to marry in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), decisions that would have been seen as impossible to hand down in previous eras of American history and times when support for same sex marriage was not as high as they have been since the 2000s. These are examples of how public opinion can sway decisions made by the Supreme Court. Interest groups are known to try to persuade the Court in its decision-making. Whenever a case that concerns their particular interest comes before the Court, interest groups will already be there the moment the Court announces they will take up that case. One of the first steps interest groups take is filing an amicus curiae briefs, In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), a case which considered whether or gun restrictions by the District of Columbia violate the Second Amendment, the National Rifle Association filed an amicus brief, as did the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, interest groups with different priorities when it comes to guns. When a controversial issue such as abortion or voting rights come before the Court, interest groups like NARAL or National Right to Life, and the NAACP or ACLU all file amicus briefs. Apart from this, they attempt to mobilize their members in an effort to gather in demonstrations and put pressure on the court to rule in their favor. In recent years, interest groups have become more involved in the nomination process for federal judges. Interest groups have worked either to support or deny the confirmation of a judge nominated to the Supreme Court. This is seen in the case of the NAACP, ACLU both vigorously opposing the nomination of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court in 1987. In other cases, interest groups have played some sort of role in the selection of a particular judge. These interest groups want a judge whose ideology is closer to theirs. This is evident in the nominations of Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court under the Trump administration. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were pre selected from a list created by the Federalist Society, a Conservative legal group. This was the result of carefully collaborated attempts by the Republican party to pack the judicial system with Conservative leaning judges, an ongoing effort going back to the Nixon administration. All of this is how interest groups have tried to influence the decisions made by the Supreme Court. The final factor behind the decision making of the Supreme Court is none other than the Justices themselves. Their ideologies are one of the most common reasons behind the reasoning of a Justices decision in a case before the Court. Their ideology is one of the reasons why they are chosen when nominated to the Supreme Court by whoever the president is. For instance, Franklin Delano Roosevelt nominated liberals William O. Douglas and Hugo Black in order to support the New Deal, and Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, the late George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush nominated conservatives such as the late William Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito, all of whom have been known for their judicial philosophy known as Originalism. Since Richard Nixon nominated Warren Burger to the position of Chief Justice in 1969, and up through the Rehnquist and Roberts courts, the Supreme Court has leaned strongly Conservative, this position considered to have been solidified with t he nomination and confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh in October of 2018. The Justices themselves are believed to try to stay on the Supreme Court as long as they can until a president of their particular political party can nominate a like minded successor. For instance, John Paul Stevens and Harry Blackmun, two of the most liberal justices to serve on the Court, chose to wait to retire under the Obama administration, despite already being 90 years old at the time. and Chief Justice Warren Burger retired in 1986 while President Reagan was in office and Republicans controlled the Senate, allowing a like minded successor to be confirmed on the Supreme Court. Thurgood Marshall, a liberal justice, was less than successful in securing a similar ideological successful as he had to retire due to poor health under the George H.W. Bush administration, being replaced by Clarence Thomas, known as one of the most conservative, and quiet justices on the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court plays a check and balance on both the executive and legislative branches, but is it democratic? The Supreme Court is considered to be the least democratic of the three branches. The fact that Justices are appointed, rather than elected is a clear factor that it can sound undemocratic, though this claim with refuted that the president who nominates this justice and the Senate which provides its advice and consent are both chosen by the American people. In our Madisonian democracy, much like the electoral college, the Supreme Court is meant to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. Even Justice John Marshall II advocated that the judiciary should not make policy from the bench, and leave that up to the President and Congress. The Supreme Court gave itself the power of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison (1803) in order to give itself independence from both the President and Congress, a move that would be considered undemocratic. An example of judicia l review was in the case of United States v. Nixon (1974), where the Supreme Court, including Justices who were nominated by President Nixon himself ruled against him in his claims that executive privilege allowed him to be above the law and turn over evidence in a criminal investigation. This landmark decision limited the Presidents powers, and the Court found that the Supreme Court had the final say in questions regarding to the Constitution, reaffirming its unique and important role in our democracy. The Founding Fathers themselves were clearly not worried about a powerful judiciary, noting that it can make decisions and strike down laws and acts by the president or Congress, but it cannot enforce those decisions, as seen with ending racial segregation in the South after Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was decided. An independent judiciary has been a hallmark of American democracy. The Court makes decisions that affects Americans of all walks of life. But in order for these decisions to happen, there are several ways which try to influence how these decisions are made. They are public opinion, interest groups, precedent, and the personal political ideologies of the Justices. Despite how undemocratic it might sound at times, the Court plays a crucial role in our Madisonian democracy, and must continue to do so in order to remain an effective body of the federal government.

Writing an Essay - What Should You Keep in Mind

Writing an Essay - What Should You Keep in Mind?The main thing to remember when writing an essay is that it should be expressed in the same manner as the subject matter. You should be able to express yourself clearly and confidently in your essay. Here are some simple things you should keep in mind when writing an essay.First of all, you should write your essay on four basic things. These are topic, keywords, basic sentences and finally your body. The best way to start writing your essay is to go over the subject matter you would like to write about. Once you have considered the subject, you will be able to think of the type of essay you will be writing.You should then write a statement of your own opinion and try to express what you feel about a particular topic. When you write this statement, try to bring clarity in what you are saying and avoid any statements that sound like facts. You can also take your time and explain yourself clearly so that the reader understands exactly how you feel about the topic.The next thing you should know about writing an essay is that you should go back to your main topic again. You should try to write the same things more than once. This is because the words may not be fresh in your mind if you just go back and forth with one topic. When you do this, you will also gain an idea on what kind of essay you want to write and what type of sentences you want to use.Before you begin writing, it is important to consider the overall length of your essay. This is because you will need to have a rough idea of the length when you are writing your essay. If you are going to have many sections in your essay, you should consider allocating separate words for each section so that you will not forget to use them.Next, you should write down a few specific questions that you want to ask yourself. For example, if you are going to write an essay on career planning, you should be prepared to ask yourself such questions as: 'What do I want to write a bout?' 'What do I want to say?'You should also try to consider other things before you even begin writing the whole idea. You should consider the main theme of your essay before you start writing the sentences. This is because you will not want to make grammatical mistakes and also you should not forget to bring clarity to your essay.Finally, the most important thing you should remember when writing an essay is that it should be easy to read. You should try to write sentences that are clear and easy to understand. You should also consider using all-capital letters when you are writing about the most important point in your essay.

How to Write Dollars in Research Papers

How to Write Dollars in Research PapersThe topic of writing dollars in research papers is the subject of this article. It's not a good topic, for a lot of reasons. It's very much related to topics that have a reputation of being difficult to write about, or downright difficult to tackle.The last thing you want is for your students to find out that you're having a problem writing dollars in research papers, when they get halfway through and say 'we don't know what's going on'. You need to be ready for this, or you could come across as a real pain.Dollars in research papers is a relatively new term that has been in use for a while, but there are still some things that you should consider, particularly if you haven't used the term before. There are two important factors that should make you think twice before just dashing off dollars in research paper. These are - does it make sense and will it get the reader interested?The problem with how to write dollars in research papers is that a lot of people think that the only way to get it right is to use the term all the time. This is usually the case with a lot of political terms. You can also find them with scientific terms but don't go overboard with the scientific terminology, and never use the terms as an excuse to just ramble.I'm going to give you some examples of how to write dollars in research papers. This will help you see that it doesn't have to be that way and you can also avoid feeling that way if you just use these pointers when you're writing.Your first example of how to write dollars in research papers would be to use the term on its full term. It should be used throughout the document, but I've seen too many papers where a student has written an abstract, then had it stripped down and they have several lines of text that using the term as a new key word. While you should still include it in the body of the paper, it's a little embarrassing to see and the author of the paper will pick up on it pretty qui ck.If the paragraph breaks make sense, use them. Again, you shouldn't use the term all the time, but when you can use it, use it. On the other hand, if there's a paragraph break that doesn't work, use a blank line instead.Writing dollars in research papers isn't easy, but you can certainly write them if you stick to these tips. Just be sure that they get read and you can always come back to them later if you need to.